Learning desk

MultiAgent EDU StackGather good sources. Teach what matters.
T5TauricResearch/TradingAgentsT5A Man Who Invented Modern AI (Before Everyone Else) – Jürgen Schmidhuber [video]T5GPT-4 finished training four years ago todayT5AI Settles a 25 Year-Old Problem We Left BehindT5What it was like working on LLMs and security at Meta (2022-2026)T5Ask HN: How do you go from writing code to deploying with agents?T5What Happened: OpenAI and HuggingFaceT5Apple says Mac users in China can connect to Alibaba's Qwen AI serviceT5Show HN: Try Benzi – A coding harness/agent beating Claude Code itself on SonnetT5The AI Apocalypse Is HereT3Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code for Pro, Max, and Team plansT5Show HN: Tura – Build agent that uses 80% less token and delivers better resultsT5TauricResearch/TradingAgentsT5A Man Who Invented Modern AI (Before Everyone Else) – Jürgen Schmidhuber [video]T5GPT-4 finished training four years ago todayT5AI Settles a 25 Year-Old Problem We Left BehindT5What it was like working on LLMs and security at Meta (2022-2026)T5Ask HN: How do you go from writing code to deploying with agents?T5What Happened: OpenAI and HuggingFaceT5Apple says Mac users in China can connect to Alibaba's Qwen AI serviceT5Show HN: Try Benzi – A coding harness/agent beating Claude Code itself on SonnetT5The AI Apocalypse Is HereT3Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code for Pro, Max, and Team plansT5Show HN: Tura – Build agent that uses 80% less token and delivers better results
← Dispatches

Illuminating complex student realities of artificial intelligence through an entangled pedagogy framework

Primary research

#888

T1new
Topic
unassigned (set during synthesis)
First seen
2026-07-28 07:16:45
Last seen
2026-07-28 07:16:45

Source raw items (1)

  • Semantic Scholar2026-07-28 07:16:04
    Illuminating complex student realities of artificial intelligence through an entangled pedagogy framework

    The emergence of widely available Generative AI (GenAI) in higher education demands nuanced responses that acknowledge the diversity of student contexts, conditions, practices and perspectives. Developing such nuanced responses requires attention to how students themselves experience and negotiate GenAI within the complexity of their everyday study and lives. In this paper, we focus on three participants from a broader set of focus groups to explore their perspectives on GenAI in relation to their studies, identities, and practices, and how contextual and personal factors shape these views. Using Fawns’ (2022) entangled pedagogy framework to guide analysis, we illuminate some complex entanglements that characterise students’ engagement with GenAI. Our analysis reveals how our students’ views were entangled with conceptions of learning, institutional governance, moral positions, and contextual considerations. By focusing on just three participants, we were able to examine the tensions and contradictions in how their relationships with GenAI were shaped in relation to circumstances, purposes, values, practices, identities, institutions, educators, peers, and perceived future trajectories. Our results suggest that meaningful action requires creating collaborative spaces where students’ voices are heard, fostering approaches that acknowledge the sociomaterial nature of learning with emerging technologies. We therefore argue that appropriate institutional responses must involve ongoing dialogue with students and attend to the complexity of their contexts and experiences.