Learning desk

MultiAgent EDU StackGather good sources. Teach what matters.
T5TauricResearch/TradingAgentsT5A Man Who Invented Modern AI (Before Everyone Else) – Jürgen Schmidhuber [video]T5GPT-4 finished training four years ago todayT5AI Settles a 25 Year-Old Problem We Left BehindT5What it was like working on LLMs and security at Meta (2022-2026)T5Ask HN: How do you go from writing code to deploying with agents?T5What Happened: OpenAI and HuggingFaceT5Apple says Mac users in China can connect to Alibaba's Qwen AI serviceT5Show HN: Try Benzi – A coding harness/agent beating Claude Code itself on SonnetT5The AI Apocalypse Is HereT3Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code for Pro, Max, and Team plansT5Show HN: Tura – Build agent that uses 80% less token and delivers better resultsT5TauricResearch/TradingAgentsT5A Man Who Invented Modern AI (Before Everyone Else) – Jürgen Schmidhuber [video]T5GPT-4 finished training four years ago todayT5AI Settles a 25 Year-Old Problem We Left BehindT5What it was like working on LLMs and security at Meta (2022-2026)T5Ask HN: How do you go from writing code to deploying with agents?T5What Happened: OpenAI and HuggingFaceT5Apple says Mac users in China can connect to Alibaba's Qwen AI serviceT5Show HN: Try Benzi – A coding harness/agent beating Claude Code itself on SonnetT5The AI Apocalypse Is HereT3Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code for Pro, Max, and Team plansT5Show HN: Tura – Build agent that uses 80% less token and delivers better results
← Dispatches

Quality assurance in generative AI-mediated education: a bibliometric and scoping review

Primary research

#653

T1new
Topic
unassigned (set during synthesis)
First seen
2026-07-23 07:15:51
Last seen
2026-07-23 07:15:51

Source raw items (1)

  • Semantic Scholar2026-07-23 07:15:18
    Quality assurance in generative AI-mediated education: a bibliometric and scoping review

    The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence has introduced transformative opportunities and critical challenges for quality assurance in educational settings. This study aims to systematically map the scientific landscape on quality assurance in education mediated by generative artificial intelligence, identifying predominant methodological approaches, conceptual frameworks, and emerging research gaps. A bibliometric and scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidance and integrating descriptive bibliometric analysis with qualitative thematic mapping. The analysis was based on 482 documents retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science, covering the period 2022–2026. The data were analyzed using a combined approach that integrates descriptive bibliometric analysis and qualitative content analysis of the abstracts. The results show a predominance of review studies, indicating a phase of conceptual consolidation in the field. There is also an increase in quantitative and experimental studies, reflecting a transition toward empirical validation of the use of generative artificial intelligence in education. From a conceptual perspective, the literature is primarily oriented toward quality assessment and ethical implications, particularly concerning biases, transparency, and responsible use of AI. In contrast, pedagogical frameworks and academic integrity show limited development. These findings highlight a structural tension between technological innovation and the need to ensure educational quality, ethical governance, and academic integrity. The need to develop integrative frameworks that articulate pedagogical, technological, and normative dimensions is emphasized. This study contributes to the understanding of an emerging field and provides relevant inputs for researchers, educators, and educational policymakers interested in the responsible implementation of generative artificial intelligence.