Learning desk

MultiAgent EDU StackGather good sources. Teach what matters.
T5TauricResearch/TradingAgentsT5A Man Who Invented Modern AI (Before Everyone Else) – Jürgen Schmidhuber [video]T5GPT-4 finished training four years ago todayT5AI Settles a 25 Year-Old Problem We Left BehindT5What it was like working on LLMs and security at Meta (2022-2026)T5Ask HN: How do you go from writing code to deploying with agents?T5What Happened: OpenAI and HuggingFaceT5Apple says Mac users in China can connect to Alibaba's Qwen AI serviceT5Show HN: Try Benzi – A coding harness/agent beating Claude Code itself on SonnetT5The AI Apocalypse Is HereT3Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code for Pro, Max, and Team plansT5Show HN: Tura – Build agent that uses 80% less token and delivers better resultsT5TauricResearch/TradingAgentsT5A Man Who Invented Modern AI (Before Everyone Else) – Jürgen Schmidhuber [video]T5GPT-4 finished training four years ago todayT5AI Settles a 25 Year-Old Problem We Left BehindT5What it was like working on LLMs and security at Meta (2022-2026)T5Ask HN: How do you go from writing code to deploying with agents?T5What Happened: OpenAI and HuggingFaceT5Apple says Mac users in China can connect to Alibaba's Qwen AI serviceT5Show HN: Try Benzi – A coding harness/agent beating Claude Code itself on SonnetT5The AI Apocalypse Is HereT3Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code for Pro, Max, and Team plansT5Show HN: Tura – Build agent that uses 80% less token and delivers better results
← Dispatches

Hope influences learning engagement through generative AI acceptance among Chinese college students: conditional direct effect of growth mindset

Primary research

#522

T1new
Topic
unassigned (set during synthesis)
First seen
2026-07-21 07:15:56
Last seen
2026-07-21 07:15:56

Source raw items (1)

  • Semantic Scholar2026-07-21 07:15:19
    Hope influences learning engagement through generative AI acceptance among Chinese college students: conditional direct effect of growth mindset

    College students' learning engagement is widely regarded as an important indicator of learning quality and academic development. Understanding the psychological and technological factors associated with learning engagement has become increasingly important in AI-supported learning environments. This study examined the relationships among hope, generative AI acceptance (GAA), growth mindset (GM), and learning engagement (LE) by proposing and testing a conditional direct effect model. Data were collected from 478 Chinese college students through an online questionnaire survey. SPSS 26.0, PROCESS 4.2, and AMOS 24.0 were used to conduct descriptive statistics, reliability and validity analyses, confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, and conditional direct effect analysis. The results indicated that hope was positively associated with learning engagement. Generative AI acceptance partially mediated the relationship between hope and learning engagement. In addition, growth mindset significantly moderated the direct association between hope and learning engagement. Specifically, the positive association between hope and learning engagement was stronger among students with lower levels of growth mindset and weaker among those with higher levels of growth mindset, suggesting a compensatory pattern between these two psychological resources. The findings highlight the complementary roles of psychological resources and technology acceptance in understanding learning engagement in AI-supported learning environments. This study contributes to the literature by integrating hope, generative AI acceptance, and growth mindset within a single framework and provides empirical evidence regarding the psychological and technological factors associated with learning engagement among college students. The findings also offer practical implications for higher education institutions seeking to support student engagement in the generative AI era.