Learning desk

MultiAgent EDU StackGather good sources. Teach what matters.
T5TauricResearch/TradingAgentsT5A Man Who Invented Modern AI (Before Everyone Else) – Jürgen Schmidhuber [video]T5GPT-4 finished training four years ago todayT5AI Settles a 25 Year-Old Problem We Left BehindT5What it was like working on LLMs and security at Meta (2022-2026)T5Ask HN: How do you go from writing code to deploying with agents?T5What Happened: OpenAI and HuggingFaceT5Apple says Mac users in China can connect to Alibaba's Qwen AI serviceT5Show HN: Try Benzi – A coding harness/agent beating Claude Code itself on SonnetT5The AI Apocalypse Is HereT3Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code for Pro, Max, and Team plansT5Show HN: Tura – Build agent that uses 80% less token and delivers better resultsT5TauricResearch/TradingAgentsT5A Man Who Invented Modern AI (Before Everyone Else) – Jürgen Schmidhuber [video]T5GPT-4 finished training four years ago todayT5AI Settles a 25 Year-Old Problem We Left BehindT5What it was like working on LLMs and security at Meta (2022-2026)T5Ask HN: How do you go from writing code to deploying with agents?T5What Happened: OpenAI and HuggingFaceT5Apple says Mac users in China can connect to Alibaba's Qwen AI serviceT5Show HN: Try Benzi – A coding harness/agent beating Claude Code itself on SonnetT5The AI Apocalypse Is HereT3Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code for Pro, Max, and Team plansT5Show HN: Tura – Build agent that uses 80% less token and delivers better results
← Dispatches

EGenAI-DBR: a design-based framework for responsible generative AI integration in higher education

Primary research

#492

T1new
Topic
unassigned (set during synthesis)
First seen
2026-07-21 07:15:55
Last seen
2026-07-21 07:15:55

Source raw items (1)

  • Semantic Scholar2026-07-21 07:15:18
    EGenAI-DBR: a design-based framework for responsible generative AI integration in higher education

    This study introduces the EGenAI-DBR framework to help educators integrate GenAI responsibly in higher education. It addresses the tension between AI's pedagogical potential and academic integrity by providing educators with a practical, ethics-centred roadmap through the Conceptual–Strategic Integration Matrix (CSIM). This study employs a Design-Based Research (DBR) methodology structured across five layers: conceptual, structural, operational, analytical and ethical. A two-phase mixed-methods design was used – a baseline survey (N = 128) via Prolific and a classroom pilot (n = 25) at a Middle Eastern institution using Google Suite and Moodle. Students entered with high GenAI familiarity (M = 4.32/5). An intention–behaviour gap was identified: 62.5% recognised uncited AI use as misconduct, yet only 58.6% consistently cited it. Clear institutional guidelines were positively associated with student confidence (M = 4.37) and stronger intentions for continued responsible GenAI use (r = 0.34, p < 0.001). EGenAI-DBR represents the first empirically tested synthesis of DBR, academic integrity and GenAI integration, operationalised through the CSIM. Unlike prohibition or detection-based approaches, it embeds ethical reasoning directly into course design, offering an institutionally accessible model applicable across diverse higher education contexts.