Learning desk

MultiAgent EDU StackGather good sources. Teach what matters.
T3Mermaid to ASCII art (mermaid-ascii)T3Kimi K3, and what we can still learn from the pelican benchmarkT3Firefox in WebAssemblyT3Spot birds not golfT3[AINews] Kimi K3 2.8T-A50B: the largest open model ever released; Opus 4.8-class at Sonnet 5 pricingT1From physical surfaces to human-centric heat stress: LST and UTCI heat mapping reveals nonlinear effects of urban morphologyT1DualHNIE: Dual-Channel Hypergraph Learning for Node Importance Estimation in Heterogeneous Knowledge GraphsT1GenTL: A General Transfer Learning Model for Building Thermal DynamicsT1A short review on the maximum clique problem algorithms with classical, AI, and quantum methodsT1Man, Machine, and Masterpiece: Artistic Ownership in the AI EraT1HABIB_TAZ at SemEval-2026 Task 11: Disentangling Formal Logic from Content via Synthetic Training and Multi-Objective OptimizationT1How Well Does AI-Generated Feedback Work? Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation across more than 20,000 EFL Essay DraftsT3Mermaid to ASCII art (mermaid-ascii)T3Kimi K3, and what we can still learn from the pelican benchmarkT3Firefox in WebAssemblyT3Spot birds not golfT3[AINews] Kimi K3 2.8T-A50B: the largest open model ever released; Opus 4.8-class at Sonnet 5 pricingT1From physical surfaces to human-centric heat stress: LST and UTCI heat mapping reveals nonlinear effects of urban morphologyT1DualHNIE: Dual-Channel Hypergraph Learning for Node Importance Estimation in Heterogeneous Knowledge GraphsT1GenTL: A General Transfer Learning Model for Building Thermal DynamicsT1A short review on the maximum clique problem algorithms with classical, AI, and quantum methodsT1Man, Machine, and Masterpiece: Artistic Ownership in the AI EraT1HABIB_TAZ at SemEval-2026 Task 11: Disentangling Formal Logic from Content via Synthetic Training and Multi-Objective OptimizationT1How Well Does AI-Generated Feedback Work? Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation across more than 20,000 EFL Essay Drafts
← Dispatches

Construction Quality Risk Factors Extraction Based on LLM-Assisted Text Mining from Big Data in Court Cases: Aligned with IDI Liability Clauses

Primary research

#320

T1digested
Topic
Industrial LLM Applications
First seen
2026-07-16 23:33:00
Last seen
2026-07-16 23:33:00

Source raw items (1)

  • Semantic Scholar2026-07-16 23:31:50
    Construction Quality Risk Factors Extraction Based on LLM-Assisted Text Mining from Big Data in Court Cases: Aligned with IDI Liability Clauses

    Construction quality risks critically affect both users’ experience and safety. Learning from the vast quality data generated by construction projects offers valuable opportunities for knowledge discovery, yet extracting reliable risk factors from unstructured texts remains challenging. Existing approaches often rely solely on term frequency and generic lexicons, overlooking causal relations and domain-specific nuances. In addition, the existing risk checklists insufficiently aligned with the liability clauses of inherent defects insurance (IDI). To address these limitations, this study develops a large language model (LLM)-assisted text-mining framework for extracting key factors from large-scale unstructured documents. The system integrates causal relation extraction powered by the LLM for obtaining explicit pairs, a domain-specific lexicon and synonym set derived from regulatory documents and expanded via LLM for improved segmentation and normalization, and an entropy-augmented term weighting scheme [term frequency–information entropy (TF-H)] to enhance the robustness of risk factor identification. Applied to 36,998 judicial judgments on construction quality disputes from 2000 to 2022 in China, the framework generates liability clause–aligned risk factor lists for IDI. The results demonstrate that the approach not only corroborates established risk factors but also reveals overlooked causes, highlighting the potential of LLM-driven text mining to enhance large-scale risk knowledge extraction. Furthermore, the findings provide practical implications for various stakeholders, including insurers, technical inspection institutions and project managers, benefiting them regarding the core workflows of IDI schemes-specifically inspection, underwriting, claims, and so on.